Titlebook: Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science; Homage to Alexandre Raffaele Pisano,Joseph Agassi,Daria Drozdova Boo

Senescent

不舒服

长矛

endure

,On the Conceptualization of Force in Johannes Kepler’s ,: An Interplay Between Physics/Mathematics his early considerations in the . (1596) until his ripest conceptions expounded in the . (1618–1621). Kepler tried to supply a dynamical explanation to the planetary movements. This is an important novelty because astronomy was traditionally a kinematical science. Based on the main accredited liter

ANTE

,Koyré Versus Olschki–Zilsel,e dont la physique modern […]” (Koyré 1939, p. 12; 1943b, p. 400) that he alleged happened at the time of Galileo. For Koyré these changes are due to “pure unadulterated thought” because, as expressed in his 1943 critique of the Olschki–Zilsel position, science “is made not by engineers or craftsmen

渐变

佛刊

,The Pitfalls and Possibilities of Following Koyré: The Younger Tom Kuhn, “Critical Historian,” on T.. and during the majority of his tenure in the Princeton history of science group—focused on “mapping” the shape of the history of the physical sciences and on modeling the dynamics, or “motor,” of scientific traditions. This paper examines the younger Kuhn’s excursions in map and motor design. It

钳子

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58017-7ce texts the way they read old classics in the humanities. Historians of science can help that project by debunking the myth that to be a good historian of science one has to be professional. Indeed, it is hard to say whether as a professional Koyré was a historian of science or of religious thought