Titlebook: Human Nature and the Limits of Darwinism; Whitley R.P. Kaufman Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Human nature

BRIEF

几何学家

ascend

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59288-0Human nature; Charles Darwin; Evolution; Sociobiology; Evolutionary ethics; Literature; Ethics

Biguanides

http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/429331.jpg

疼死我了

978-1-349-95514-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

endure

MURAL

Book 2016and the newer, Darwinian model. In the traditional view, the human being is a hybrid being, with alower, animal nature and a higher, rational or “spiritual” component. Thecompeting Darwinian account does away with the idea of a higher nature andattempts to provide a complete reduction of human natur

干涉

Introduction: Bridging the Two Cultures,f biology or at least be Darwinized, that is, interpreted in terms of evolutionary principles. At the heart of both issues is the question of whether the mechanistic, materialistic model adopted by science is appropriate to understanding human behavior, which unlike particles appears to be rational and goal-directed.

expound

Does Science Refute Free Will?,usion. In this chapter, we show why the arguments made against free will are misguided. There is no reason to believe that science has raised any serious doubt about our capacity to deliberate and choose based on reason. Indeed, science itself presupposes just such a rational capacity.

爱社交