Titlebook: Hugo Grotius in International Thought; Renée Jeffery Book 2006 Renée Jeffery 2006 international relations.morality.Political Thought

Alacrity

书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought网络公开度




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought被引频次




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought被引频次学科排名




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought年度引用




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought年度引用学科排名




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought读者反馈




书目名称Hugo Grotius in International Thought读者反馈学科排名

Amorous

Hugo Grotius and Twentieth-Century International Relations,ding in international legal thought, in the second half of the twentieth century, Grotius became almost exclusively discussed within the admittedly porous and ill-defined bounds of (predominantly British) International Relations.

CROW

HATCH

Grotian Morality in Europe and Beyond,That this was the case is certainly hinted at in a letter to Grotius from magistrate M. Bignon dated March 5, 1632:.Of course, the “great king” who always had a copy of . at hand was King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden who, as legend has it, slept with a copy of the work under his pillow.

ethereal

变形词

The Grotius Story,rists. His 1625 work . is rightly counted alongside Hobbes’ . and Kant’s . as one of the most important “classics” of international thought.. The exemplar of the so-called “rationalist” tradition of international theory, Grotius is often viewed as mediating the contending claims of the “realist” and

keloid

Petechiae

Grotian Morality in Europe and Beyond,l Malcolm writes, his “intellectual and theological respectability … was so great that he achieved an almost talismanic status” among proponents of the law of nature.. In particular, not only was . “reprinted or translated fifty times between 1625 and 1758”. but, as Lord Blanesburgh remarked in a sp

先锋派

The Grotian Tradition in International Thought, first is the Dutch scholar Cornelius van Vollenhoven whose 1918 . sought to defend Grotius’ work against the “misshapen conglomeration of hypocrisy and cynicism” that was, in his view, Vattel’s ... The second figure is Hersch Lauterpacht whose 1946 work “The Grotian Tradition in International Law”

灰心丧气

Hugo Grotius and Twentieth-Century International Relations,gure of the field’s heritage. In the majority of textbooks on the subject he is relegated to the annals of history, a figure skipped over with relative brevity in introductory overviews of the history of modern international law. Among the few international legal theorists of the late twentieth cent