Titlebook: Harold Macmillan and Britain’s World Role; Richard Aldous (Lecturer in Modern British History Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

Metastasis

disrupt

FOLLY

al reappraisal of British foreign policy between 1957 and 1963, addressing how successfully Macmillan answered his own key question: ‘Why should the UK stay in the big game?‘978-1-349-24316-7978-1-349-24314-3

合适

Macmillan and the Middle East,orce in cables sent during his visit to America in September 1956. Finally, and confusingly, it was the breaking of Macmillan’s nerve during the Suez landings which more than any other single factor seems to have dictated the decision to halt operations on the morning of 6 November 1956.

同步左右

Macmillan and the End of the British Empire in Africa, in the climb-down from Empire. How much influence did he have on setting the decolonisation agenda? To what degree was he affected by domestic considerations? What influence did other foreign policy considerations have on his thinking? Finally, what did he hope to achieve through decolonisation and how successfully did he fulfil his aim?

reflection

Staying in the Game? Coming into the Game? Macmillan and European Integration,t serve British interests in the European context and at worst hampered them. Macmillan’s Europeanism has been called into question, most recendy by Richard Davenport-Hines, who stated, referring to de Gaulle’s first veto of British entry into the EEC:

手榴弹

捕鲸鱼叉

,‘A Family Affair’: Macmillan and the Art of Personal Diplomacy,or ascribing his political death in 1963 to the ‘sword’ of television, a medium which earlier he had exploited with alacrity. Macmillan was the first British Prime Minister to understand the significance of television and, although he feigned contempt for its intrusions, he used it to regain the pro

nocturia

strdulate