找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: ;

[复制链接]
楼主: ANNOY
发表于 2025-3-25 03:56:30 | 显示全部楼层
Adopting Ethical Reasoning in Policy Processes,lanced value conflict management. Complex policy processes require that idealistic discourse ethics is relaxed to acknowledge the importance of individual reflections in ethical reasoning; strategic argumentation; and the possibility of having public ethicists guiding ethical reasoning. The chapter
发表于 2025-3-25 08:17:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:10:17 | 显示全部楼层
Institutionalizing Green Public Ethics,aucratic ethos. The main argument is that institutional change beyond Weberian instrumental rationality is necessary for green ethical practices to be successfully adopted and upgraded in policy processes. It is elaborated how Weberian principles largely persist in the minds of many public officials
发表于 2025-3-25 16:42:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:09:29 | 显示全部楼层
Gegenstand und Ziel der Untersuchung,ged somehow by public officials. It is argued that Weberian bureaucratic principles and rationalistic methods tend to dominate, which evokes the following critical question: why not ethical reasoning? The purpose is to develop . as a pragmatic normative approach that can guide environmental value co
发表于 2025-3-26 01:14:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9114-0pluralism for making sense of practical policy problems and to manage public value conflicts. In developing this approach, three fields of literature are utilized: public administration ethics, public policy ethics, and pragmatic environmental ethics. It is argued that “good values” can be combined
发表于 2025-3-26 05:49:48 | 显示全部楼层
Katharina Schulte,Carsten Schrödericy processes. It is argued that despite decades of reform activities, three fundamental Weberian ideals tend to persist, which limit the possibilities for ethical reasoning in policy processes: instrumental rationality; the politics-administration distinction; and public administration as a formal
发表于 2025-3-26 11:47:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:43:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:33:12 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57926-4 activism: radical environmental movement activism; green inside activism—officials having contacts with environmental movements and seeking to change public policy from inside; and science activism in terms of scientists being environmental activists as an integral part of their professional role.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 23:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表