Titlebook: ;

aphasia

Three Tests,egal system. Since there are several theories that focus on that issue, and given that these theories claim that legal practice should be understood as having the same structure as other practices with which we are familiar (such as conventional practices, the practice that obtains when there is a s

恶名声

,Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (I): Hart’s Account and the Coordinative-Convention Apptheory. This chapter explores whether this sort of account proposes a good explanation of conventional practices in general, whether it captures the institutional character of legal practice, and whether it explains disagreement among officials. It is argued that it does not. This sort of account do

Musculoskeletal

,Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (II): Raz’s Account,vely complex social rule. It is argued that Raz’s account also fails. It does not capture the nature of social rules in general, for one crucial aspect of them (the fact that social rules are invoked as complete reasons for action) is left unexplained. It does not capture the institutional character

无能性

infringe

分散

The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type (I). Non-developed Instances of Legal Practition to the initial model is quite straightforward: participants believe that the collective activity is valuable in relation to others, and think that there is a normative consideration according to which one must do one’s part of a joint action which is valuable. This expanded model allegedly cap

Fibrinogen

雀斑

On Agreements,o agree and why agreements may be binding by explaining what it is to promise and why promising may be binding. They also attempt to solve another problem, the treatment of which is important for the general argument of the book: they try to establish how the content of agreements is determined. Thr

ANA

The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type II. Other-Regarding, Developed Institutions. It is argued that it captures most instances of institutional practices in general, and of legal practice in particular. The main idea is that, in these cases, participants think that content-independent normative considerations require that they perform their parts. This is paradigmatically the c

上釉彩

Developed Instances of Legal Practice. Meeting the Tests,hat they are under a duty. And they can accommodate disagreement at a fundamental level. The test-case of an actual example of this kind of disagreement in a contemporary legal system is analyzed briefly.