Titlebook: ;

prick-test

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68018-7r false with respect to what they are about. The nature of these practices of claim-making has been studied by philosophers and psychologists alike. Furthermore, important strands in evolutionary studies have relied on both psychological and philosophical theories for addressing the question of how

才能

Michel Moisan,Jacques Pelletierr similar idea has recently been elaborated from the naturalistic perspective by Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber. They argue that reasoning evolved originally and primarily for the purposes of social justification and argumentation. In this chapter I compare the inferentialist account of reasoning with

认为

ULCER

正式演说

A New Approach to the Glass Transitionnd Behavior,” p. 298). For familiar Wittgensteinian reasons, conceptual activity cannot be rule-. activity. Sellars therefore articulates a . between rule-following activity and mere rule-conforming behavior—something he calls .. The task is to explain how pattern-governed behavior is related to rul

刺穿

A. M. Fridman,V. L. Polyachenkowork for thinking about the contents of: (1) descriptive thoughts and sentences having a representational or mind-to-world direction of fit, and which manifest our capacity for theoretical rationality; and (2) prescriptive and intentional sentences having an expressive or world-to-mind direction of

Acetaldehyde

needle

五行打油诗

Normative Mindshaping and the Normative Nichehow deeply normative we as humans are. I argue that even the most promising accounts of this movement, such as those based on the concept of “mindshaping” or on the idea of “social niche construction” must be seen as essentially normative enterprises.

拒绝