Titlebook: ;

流眼泪

匍匐

List of Conventions, well as different points of view. To facilitate homogeneity in and understanding of this book, I list here some notational conventions and explain some common predicates which are used to access the knowledge base.

LASH

The Entity-Relationship Model,ts. It facilitates the engineering approach of incorporating the proposed representations and methods into other semantic interpretation modules and knowledge bases for text understanding. Different parts of this model have been argued for in different parts of this book..Classes and their members,

PUT

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230276079 the text. It maybe exploited for means of fact retrieval/extraction (Grishman & Hirschman, 1978; Jacobs & Rau, 1990), question answering (Scha, 1990; Cercone & McCalla, 1986), summarization (Alterman, 1992; Hutchins, 1987), or even machine translation (Nirenburg et al., 1992; Carbonell & Tomita, 19

有角

Michelle Ferrier,Nisha Garud-Patkarnts — and I mentioned some others before (Appelt et al., 1993; Neumann et al., 1997; Staab et al., 1999) — the issue of howthese principles are put to work in a particular setting is interesting in itself..On the one hand, the setting is given by the range of texts to which the text knowledge extrac

opportune

食道

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87476-6esentational question of which relations on degrees are used to denote degree expressions — an issue which goes beyond the scope of lexical semantics since it calls for an adequate inferencing procedure. In the previous chapter, I used the standard comparison relations on real numbers to represent c

奇怪

degrees is to determine the pair of compared objects and to construct the proper comparison relation between the relevant degrees adjoined to them. Establishing this comparison relation often requires the reconstruction of semantic material that did not appear on the surface of the utterance and, th

VEST

Gianluca Iazzolino,Nicole Stremlausociated with a .. For instance, the semantics of (6.1b) is not denoted by a predicate for ., but by one for ., where C is constrained by the context in which (6.1b) occurs. This becomes immediately evident in example (6.1) where the context of the utterance, .. (6.1a), crucially determines the vali

Sedative