找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Government by the Market?; The Politics of Publ Peter Self Textbook 1993Latest edition Peter Self 1993 Government.Policy.political thought.

[复制链接]
楼主: 渗漏
发表于 2025-3-25 06:44:55 | 显示全部楼层
Privatising Welfare,res which can be claimed to represent improvements in public service. The chapter starts and ends with the political basis of the welfare state and includes examples of policy changes in the provision and delivery of personal social services, housing, education, health and social security.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:54:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 12:58:07 | 显示全部楼层
alternative view of the basis of good government. This book offers a unique survey and critique of the ideas and influence of an important branch of political thought and its links with market theories. 
发表于 2025-3-25 16:50:25 | 显示全部楼层
techniques. This book gives a concise, non- technical account of these ‘public choice‘ theories and examines their influence upon government policies in English-speaking countries. Issues covered include slimming the state, privatising welfare and re- structuring government. Final chapters offer an
发表于 2025-3-25 20:50:44 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8nterest to oppose prevailing special interests; to harness ‘latent interests’ to overcome the roadblocks of entrenched organisations; and to persuade their own party and supporters to eschew ‘consensus politics’ in favour of radical measures and a bold confrontation of opponents.
发表于 2025-3-26 01:53:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:14:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:11:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:24:10 | 显示全部楼层
Restructuring Government,nment and bureaucracy, but it is possible to examine the new directions which have been imposed upon the often resistant structure of the state. Nor can it be said that these directions are entirely novel, since in some cases they represent an acceleration of trends which were already present in earlier decades.
发表于 2025-3-26 17:40:11 | 显示全部楼层
Slimming the State,nterest to oppose prevailing special interests; to harness ‘latent interests’ to overcome the roadblocks of entrenched organisations; and to persuade their own party and supporters to eschew ‘consensus politics’ in favour of radical measures and a bold confrontation of opponents.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 13:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表