Titlebook: Governing New European Democracies; Jean Blondel,Ferdinand Müller-Rommel,Erik Sootla Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

定点

ELATE

Complex Series and Theory of Residuesd of the various tasks of prime ministers’ offices in western democracies. The authors confirm that the coordination of cabinet proposals by prime ministerial staff has become a crucial variable helping to measure cabinet capacity at all stages of the policy-making process (Peters . 2000).

chronology

How Ministers View the Role of Prime Ministers’ Officesd of the various tasks of prime ministers’ offices in western democracies. The authors confirm that the coordination of cabinet proposals by prime ministerial staff has become a crucial variable helping to measure cabinet capacity at all stages of the policy-making process (Peters . 2000).

女歌星

The End of Communism and the New Party Systemugh the part played by Solidarity, the final years of the communist regime saw moves taking place in the direction of ‘alternative’ groupings and organizations: but these were the only countries in which opportunities of this kind occurred. In the other countries of the region which are more specifi

affect

Party Government and Cabinet Decision-Makingmple cabinet ministers and especially the prime minister) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties’. The party or parties which are being considered are, of course, the ‘supporting’ parties and not the opposition, although, in some cases at least,

允许

Coalitions, Single-Party Governments and Cabinet Decision-Makingn be expected to share a common ideological outlook. Coalition governments, by contrast, have been felt likely to be either ineffectual or unstable: ineffectual if the ministers from different parties cannot agree on the policies to follow, unstable if these ministers prefer to break the cabinet to

箴言

Ministers and the Role of Civil Servants in Cabinet Decision-Makingdy of bureaucrats while the latter approach is associated with the work of Peters (1986). Both approaches focus on the relative power of politicians and civil servants in policymaking processes and they are both concerned with the development of a professional and politically neutral administration.

BUOY

Finance Ministers and Cabinet Decision-Making stems from the extent to which ministers are willing, and perhaps able, to participate actively in that process; the other is close to being formal and results from the manifestly special part played by the prime minister.