找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation; Catherine England Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991 Bank.Europe.

[复制链接]
查看: 27454|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 17:34:30 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation
编辑Catherine England
视频video
丛书名称Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions
图书封面Titlebook: Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation;  Catherine England Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991 Bank.Europe.
描述Risk-based capital standards presume a need for common capital standards across countries. The details of forging an agreement were left to the staffs of the primary bank regulators in each country, and compromises were inevitable. Although domestic constituencies‘ reactions to the proposals were invited, the arduous negotiations that led to the proposals generated intense pressure on the principals not to make changes. The European Community‘s approach to financial integration seems to be driven by a political desire to achieve an integrated market within Europe, despite significant institutional differences among countries. Underlying that desire is a belief that the market pressures that result from different regulatory systems operating in the same market will produce the right answer. The financial provisions of the U.S.-Canada free-trade agreement take a direction that, in my judgment, is more productive. The provisions are more limited in scope than are those of the European initiative. National treatment and national sovereignty are preserved. However, the delicate issue of national responsibility for failing institutions, and its relationship to monetary policies, is not a
出版日期Book 1991
关键词Bank; Europe; Rating; banking; competition; monetary policy; prevention
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6714-7
isbn_softcover978-1-4684-6716-1
isbn_ebook978-1-4684-6714-7
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 1991
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation网络公开度




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation被引频次




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation年度引用




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation读者反馈




书目名称Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:52:57 | 显示全部楼层
Governing Banking’s Future: A View from the Fed. In the early years of the Republic, the First and Second Banks of the United States provided an anchor to America’s emerging banking system, but many Americans saw those institutions as an anchor that impeded progress, not as one that provided needed stability. Thus, it was no great surprise, when
发表于 2025-3-22 03:27:10 | 显示全部楼层
International Regulation: How Much Cooperation is Needed?as been raised repeatedly in many different contexts. I will attempt to address that question by analyzing three recent attempts at coordinating international regulation: (1) the risk-based capital standards developed by the regulators of the major industrial countries, (2) the financial integration
发表于 2025-3-22 06:26:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:47:58 | 显示全部楼层
Can Banks be Insulated from Nonbank Affiliates?ding companies. Interest in that rather arcane topic is increasing because the bank insulation issue has become intertwined with the debate over allowing banking organizations to exercise additional powers such as offering a full line of securities or insurance services.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:22:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:37:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:25:25 | 显示全部楼层
Daylight Overdrafts: Who Really Bears the Risk? studies is that daylight overdrafts are the primary source of risk in the U.S. electronic payment systems. The institutions that create overdrafts do not bear the full costs, and although recent regulation of the large-dollar transfer systems has reduced somewhat the risk associated with overdrafts
发表于 2025-3-23 02:20:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:41:46 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 14:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表