Titlebook: Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria; Adeoye O. Akinola Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

年迈

书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria网络公开度




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria被引频次




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria被引频次学科排名




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria年度引用




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria年度引用学科排名




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria读者反馈




书目名称Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria读者反馈学科排名

Fermentation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-68199-8ion towards understanding the complex nature of the efforts to deregulate the Nigerian oil sector. This includes historical background on globalized aspects of Nigerian oil sector reform, as well as the realities inherent in the attainment of neo-liberal ideologies in Nigeria as viewed from within the broad spectrum of political economy.

enlist

Introduction,ion towards understanding the complex nature of the efforts to deregulate the Nigerian oil sector. This includes historical background on globalized aspects of Nigerian oil sector reform, as well as the realities inherent in the attainment of neo-liberal ideologies in Nigeria as viewed from within the broad spectrum of political economy.

xanthelasma

2634-5773 avigating economic or institutional reforms, especially in t.The Nigerian state has been oil-rich for decades, and yet perennially incapable of converting its oil resources into wealth for ordinary Nigerians. Adeoye O. Akinola tackles this “vexed” oil question by examining the political economy of e

CLASH

Natura ed entità dell’errore e del dannoexpanding the economic base of societies and ensuring effective service delivery; however, the inherent contradictions it generates strengthened the positions of protagonists of the neo-liberal ideology.

财主

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80038-2regulation policy by government was greatly flawed and based on false assumptions. However, the reality in the sector and reluctance of the Nigerian government to embark on public management makes deregulation a matter of necessity and not of choice.

财主

马赛克

HUMID

积习难改

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0469-9derdevelopment of the periphery. Dependent development theory dismissed liberalism and redefined the role of states and the transformation of public institutions into management bodies, while the new public management theory addressed the quest for a policy shift in the oil sector under a management-oriented Nigerian bureaucracy.