Titlebook: Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour; Contesting Neo-Grams Andreas Bieler,Werner Bonefeld,Adam David Morton Book 2006 Palgrave M

Amalgam

书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour网络公开度




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour被引频次




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour被引频次学科排名




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour年度引用




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour年度引用学科排名




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour读者反馈




书目名称Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour读者反馈学科排名

agitate

A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Changecrucial break with mainstream International Relations (IR) approaches emerged by the 1980s in the work of Robert Cox. In contrast to mainstream routes to hegemony in IR, which develop a static theory of politics, an abstract ahistorical conception of the state and an appeal to universal validity (e.

FLINT

Neo-Gramscian Hegemony and the International Orderrather that as the first serious engagement with neo-Gramscian theory the piece has a certain cogency and is of interest as it stands. In terms of the further development of the Open Marxist alternative to neo-Gramscian theory, the reader is directed to chapters 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11 in this volume by

羊齿

European Integration and Eastward Enlargement Treaty of Maastricht. Enlargement rounds including Austria, Finland and Sweden in 1995 and the accession of additional ten countries from Central and Eastern Europe as well as the Mediterranean area in 2004 intensified European integration further. Neo-Gramscian perspectives were initially applied

松软无力

Trypsin

Structural Change and Neo-liberalism in Mexicoe of Mexico stands out in the region because of the state’s pivotal position in 1982 in announcing it could no longer service its debt obligations. The ensuing era of first generation neo-liberal reforms throughout the 1980s and 1990s also exceeded in many ways the transformations envisaged by the s

Trypsin

Human Progress and Capitalist Developmenthis relationship has undergone a fundamental change that necessitates analyses of current developments in terms of a transition to a new capitalist epoch. According to this view, ‘the nation-state phase of capitalism’ has been eroded and its Fordist mode of regulation is superseded by globalization—

eucalyptus

Globalization, the State and Class Strugglers throughout the book. This approach is constituted by a diverse but nevertheless distinct group of scholars committed to the dialectic of subject-object and theory-practice and the (re)constitution of categories in and through the development of a crisis-ridden social world in the analysis of the

微枝末节

Social Constitution and Critical Economyted with a critique of the state, and not with an affirmative political theory (cf. Bonefeld, 2003). In fact, state-centrism is generally levelled against neo-Gramscian accounts (cf. Clarke, 1991b). In this perspective, it was not only the state that was national in the past but also capitalist ‘acc

Demulcent