Titlebook: Global Media and Communication Policy; An International Per Petros Iosifidis Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishe

凶猛

津贴

Conclusionicy and regulation at national level, attached to the territorial boundaries and distinct regulatory approaches depending on the political system. However, national media and communications systems have been forced to evolve owing mainly to the phenomena of globalization, reregulation and liberaliza

fodlder

Auctions and Multi-agent Systemso regulate the media, telecommunications and the Internet in contemporary society. It aims to analyze the policy process, consider policy issues and shape policy debates, which are increasingly taking place at a supranational level. The bulk of the relevant academic literature up to now has mainly c

ADORN

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00057-8 performance of media systems and designing policies that might enhance such performance (McQuail, 1992a). These criteria may vary across different national contexts, but there are some core principles that underpin effective media policies. Serving the public interest is a normative principle that

forthy

压倒

Intelligent Integration of Informationons policies are generally guided by and legitimized in the name of the ‘public interest’. The literature review attempted to outline the terms in which the field is defined, but it was far from comprehensive in terms of geographical reach, for it was limited to English-language publications with ex

费解

eulogize

Weitao Chen,Cheng Zhong,Xuwen Qin,Lizhe Wanglls for the diminishing role or even ‘death’ of the state. Much of the debate on globalization within media and communication studies has focused on the consequences of the forces of globalization on the relevance of national policymaking. On the one hand are those who assert that technological deve

Gum-Disease

绅士

Machine vision for industrial applications,latory regime to oversee communication issues in its territory. While the print media in Europe have traditionally enjoyed a great degree of autonomy and self-regulation (Hutchison, 2007), broadcasting has attracted state intervention because of technical matters (spectrum limitation1) but also beca