Titlebook: Global History in China; Xin Fan Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Sin

我要威胁

P. E. Howse,I. D. R. Stevens,O. T. Jones history remains contentious. The second part of the book delves deeper into this issue by examining the practice of global history in China, with a particular focus on conceptual history. While some scholars in East Asia conflate global history with world history, this chapter demonstrates that glo

伪书

Phonophobia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4914-3historians in China regarding the role of the national in shaping global history. Some scholars advocate for the composition of global history with distinctive Chinese characteristics, emphasizing the inherent national character essential to historical practice. This chapter diverges from this persp

充满人

The Structure of Insect Musclesitical fervor characterizing the rise of international studies and foreign studies during the 1960s and 1970s, marked by a pronounced anti-imperialist stance. Early world historians and international studies scholars leveraged history to propel the ideological aspirations of the global revolution, l

肥料

global history as an emerging field of scholarly studies in China today. Readers are invited to rethink the origin of global history in China and to examine its current state. Chinese scholarship is rooted in a warm appreciation of globalization in the age of Opening-up and Reform and presented as

FLING

Experimental and Clinical Neuroscienceerature in the field while outlining the book’s dual methodology: an intellectual history of historiography and a sociological examination of disciplinary formation. Furthermore, it delineates key personalities, events, and themes to be explored in subsequent chapters.

Introduction

ILEUM

P. E. Howse,I. D. R. Stevens,O. T. Joneserplay between local knowledge and transnational concepts. Through a case study on the translation of the term “republic” from English into Chinese via Japan, this chapter illustrates the dynamic relationship between the local, the regional, and the global in historical studies.

Needlework

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3202-0tions theories. Using the assertion of ancient China’s engagement with international law as a case study, this chapter argues that the wealth of Chinese historical records offers valuable insights to debunk the narrow perspectives inherent in modernity discourse.

IST

Global Intellectual Historyerplay between local knowledge and transnational concepts. Through a case study on the translation of the term “republic” from English into Chinese via Japan, this chapter illustrates the dynamic relationship between the local, the regional, and the global in historical studies.