找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Giving Reasons; A Linguistic-Pragmat Lilian Bermejo Luque Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argumentation.Argumentation T

[复制链接]
查看: 48579|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 16:07:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Giving Reasons
副标题A Linguistic-Pragmat
编辑Lilian Bermejo Luque
视频video
概述Provides Argumentation Theory with a new, linguistic approach.Integrates argumentation’s logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions.Solves challenging meta-theoretical questions, e.g. the justific
丛书名称Argumentation Library
图书封面Titlebook: Giving Reasons; A Linguistic-Pragmat Lilian Bermejo Luque Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argumentation.Argumentation T
描述This book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized..The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman’s New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reaso
出版日期Book 2011
关键词Argumentation; Argumentation Theory; Argumentative Value; Burden of Proof; Cognitivism; Deductivism; Deep
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3784-6
isbn_ebook978-94-007-1761-9Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Giving Reasons影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Giving Reasons影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Giving Reasons网络公开度




书目名称Giving Reasons网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Giving Reasons被引频次




书目名称Giving Reasons被引频次学科排名




书目名称Giving Reasons年度引用




书目名称Giving Reasons年度引用学科排名




书目名称Giving Reasons读者反馈




书目名称Giving Reasons读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:52:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:03:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:52:52 | 显示全部楼层
The Logical Dimension of Argumentation,ons, it follows that, if argumentation is a complex of logical, dialectical and rhetorical properties, as contended in Chapter 3, then good argumentation will be argumentation satisfying logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions..Yet, the other side of this coin is that argumentative normativit
发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:24 | 显示全部楼层
The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation,have to fulfill two tasks: on the one hand, showing that any type of argumentation, whether dialogical or monological, involves such a dialectical dimension; but on the other hand, showing that dialectical normativity cannot be reduced to argumentative normativity ...In this chapter, I deal with the
发表于 2025-3-22 15:03:15 | 显示全部楼层
The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation,ncept of argumentative value..In order to show the specifics of this proposal, I outline current strategies for dealing with the rhetorical within Argumentation Theory. This task is partly carried out by following the criticisms that C. Kock has raised against the three main theories of argumentatio
发表于 2025-3-22 17:59:10 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation Appraisal,heory. Consequently, I deal with the logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions that determine whether an act of arguing succeeds at its constitutive goal of showing a target claim to be correct..As pointed out in Chapter 1, in our account, the analysis of argumentation is to be displayed on two
发表于 2025-3-22 21:28:51 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3cifics of linguistic communication. In addition, it is meant to show in which ways the activity of arguing is particularly akin to humans as rational and social beings: on the one hand, it is a tool to make our beliefs and claims rational, that is, a justificatory device; on the other, it is a means
发表于 2025-3-23 03:09:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:24:55 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 01:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表