找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Giving Desert Its Due; Social Justice and L Wojciech Sadurski Book 1985 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1985 Europe.Reichsrechnungsleg

[复制链接]
楼主: Remodeling
发表于 2025-3-25 05:36:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 09:51:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:31:04 | 显示全部楼层
Preferential Treatment of justice sketched there belongs to what John Rawls calls ‘ideal theory’; it assumes that principles of justice “will be strictly complied with and followed by everyone”.. Ideal theory is always utopian. It is a . utopia in that it provides us with a vision of the world to be sought, yet it is a u
发表于 2025-3-25 16:43:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 21:46:20 | 显示全部楼层
Beyond Social Justiceed to show that the principles of legal justice cannot stand on their own unless based upon an antecedently accepted set of judgments about social justice. Accordingly, my second aim was to propose and defend a particular conception of social justice.
发表于 2025-3-26 01:51:56 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1938-3tice is, as Hayek suggests, “intellectually disreputable, the mark of demagogy or cheap journalism”.. On the contrary, in our time we are witnessing the growing importance of the concept of social justice, in public consciousness, in political discourse and in philosophical discussions. With growing
发表于 2025-3-26 07:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:21:15 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57682-0any attempts at justification of various judgments of justice are bound to fail. If, as Alf Ross says, “[t]o invoke justice is the same thing as banging on the table”,. then nothing sensible can be said about justification or defence of the principles of justice.
发表于 2025-3-26 13:20:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:10:10 | 显示全部楼层
Alex Yakovlev,Luis Gomes,Luciano Lavagnod by John Rawls as ‘reflective equilibrium’ and which has been discussed above.. The principle of justice is a generalization based on particular moral convictions (namely: about the justice of compensatory measures) and then applied to those cases that call for a just arrangement although they do n
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 15:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表