Titlebook: Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence; De-Europeanization b Gunther Hellmann Book 20061st edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Mac

面临

书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence网络公开度




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence被引频次




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence被引频次学科排名




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence年度引用




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence年度引用学科排名




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence读者反馈




书目名称Germany‘s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence读者反馈学科排名

马笼头

Trapped Inside the European Fortress? Germany and European Union Asylum and Refugee Policy,be traced back to initiatives that were supported by, or even originated in Germany, further institutionalization, most prominently through qualified majority voting, has been vetoed by Germany at all major summits since Amsterdam. Reconstructing the interplay between German policy initiatives and s

nautical

,Missing in Action? Germany’s Bumpy Road from Institution-Building to Substance in European Security’ of 2002–04, Germany’s policy on European security and defence has undergone some changes that go to the very identity of the federal republic. In terms of European policy, the German government has changed from a vanguard to a laggard in a crucial issue area of European integration: whereas it use

Polydipsia

Lamed Power: Germany and European Integration,rticular, and contrasting this with the available academic literature, we thought that we were witnessing complex, subtle and potentially far-reaching processes of change which were not sufficiently well captured by available approaches. Well into the second half of the 1990s the overwhelming majori

Negligible

2947-6747 and security policy, the book develops an innovative framework for analysis that is capable of accounting for an incremental ‘de-Europeanization‘ in Germany‘s EU policy.978-1-349-54181-2978-0-230-50289-5Series ISSN 2947-6747 Series E-ISSN 2947-6755

改革运动

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30835-2majority voting, has been vetoed by Germany at all major summits since Amsterdam. Reconstructing the interplay between German policy initiatives and structures of European governance, this chapter seeks to demonstrate how such a fundamental change could occur.

改革运动

Meager

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12111-4has been declining. In terms of military policy, Germany’s now frequent contributions to military missions contrast with the anti-militarist tradition of the Bonn Republic. Equally importantly, conscription that used to coin the identity of the ‘Bonn Republic’ has been undermined to an extent that makes its abolition a mere question of time.

藐视

,Missing in Action? Germany’s Bumpy Road from Institution-Building to Substance in European Securityhas been declining. In terms of military policy, Germany’s now frequent contributions to military missions contrast with the anti-militarist tradition of the Bonn Republic. Equally importantly, conscription that used to coin the identity of the ‘Bonn Republic’ has been undermined to an extent that makes its abolition a mere question of time.

MIRTH