找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Germ-Line Intervention and Our Responsibilities to Future Generations; Emmanuel Agius (Coordinator),Salvino Busuttil Book 19981st edition

[复制链接]
楼主: 使无罪
发表于 2025-3-26 22:32:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 02:28:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:11:54 | 显示全部楼层
Should we Treat the Human Germ-Line as a Global Human Resource?sts to pursue “germ-line gene therapy”: genetic engineering interventions that would effect changes in people that would be passed along to their offspring as a natural part of their genetic inheritance. The question of whether to proceed with germ-line gene therapy is usually posed as a question ab
发表于 2025-3-27 09:47:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 15:06:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 20:03:31 | 显示全部楼层
Are We Our Descendants’ Keepers?fe itself is not one’s “possession” but rather belongs to the gods. Furthermore, human beings have a positive duty to guard life, not to let it go. The gods are our keepers in the sense of ownership, but we are their delegates or trustees in the role of guardians of the property they own, namely lif
发表于 2025-3-28 00:52:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 05:38:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:22:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:45:15 | 显示全部楼层
Redesigning the Human Genome: Are There Constraints from Nature?s and bodies, Maurice de Wachter concludes: “If one assumes that such reports, recommendation and guidelines reflect society’s opinion on the matter, we must conclude that the rather general approval which somatic cell gene therapy receives does not exist regarding germ-line therapy” (de Wachter, p. 169). One can ask: Why the difference?
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 04:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表