Titlebook: Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution; A Study in Utopia an Victor Zitta Book 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordr

太平间

书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution网络公开度




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution被引频次




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution被引频次学科排名




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution年度引用




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution年度引用学科排名




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution读者反馈




书目名称Georg Lukács’ Marxism Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution读者反馈学科排名

Panther

颠簸下上

Celiac-Plexus

Lukács’ Theory of the Revolution and the Institution: From Human Heteronomy to Inhuman Autonomyculiar manner. This peculiarity is not due to the unorthodoxy of his views, to their departure from what the Marxian texts demand; rather it is connected with the revealing character of Lukács’ theories. Lukács accentuates aspects of Marxism which his comrades preferred to leave dormant and undiscussed for good reasons.

neologism

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6089-9roletariat’ which is for this reason a dialectic, Janus-faced entity. One may speak of Lukács’ views about the ‘proletariat’ as a ., and his views about the ‘proletariat’ as a ... And here the secularized messianism of his Marxism comes fully to the fore..

obeisance

obeisance

未完成

轻而薄

Promethean Impulsions (1908)n so doing, he eventually removed himself emotionally and intellectually from where he might have been able to distinguish between what is possible as against what is not possible, what can be done here and now as against what can only be construed in one’s dreams.

Inflated

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6717-8n so doing, he eventually removed himself emotionally and intellectually from where he might have been able to distinguish between what is possible as against what is not possible, what can be done here and now as against what can only be construed in one’s dreams.