找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Genetics and the Law; Aubrey Milunsky (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Book 1976 Plenum Press, New York 1976 Nation.cognition.ethics.gen

[复制链接]
查看: 21942|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 19:25:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Genetics and the Law
编辑Aubrey Milunsky (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Genetics and the Law;  Aubrey Milunsky (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Book 1976 Plenum Press, New York 1976 Nation.cognition.ethics.gen
描述Society has historically not taken a benign view of genetic disease. The laws permitting sterilization of the mentally re­ tarded~ and those proscribing consanguineous marriages are but two examples. Indeed as far back as the 5th-10th centuries, B.C.E., consanguineous unions were outlawed (Leviticus XVIII, 6). Case law has traditionally tended toward the conservative. It is reactive rather than directive, exerting its influence only after an individual or group has sustained injury and brought suit. In contrast, state legislatures have not been inhibited in enacting statutes. Many of their products can be characterized as hasty, unnecessary, ill-conceived, and based on the heart rather than the head. Moreover the lack of expert consultation sought has also been remarkable. One state legislature, for example, has advocated immunization for sickle cell anemia! Many others have enacted laws for the screening of inborn errors of metabolism, e.g., phenylketon­ uria, but have poorly defined the lines of responsibility to secure compliance. A spate of specific disease-related bills has emerged in the u.S. Congress, each seeking recognition and appropriations. Sickle cell anemia, hemophili
出版日期Book 1976
关键词Nation; cognition; ethics; genetics; medical profession; profession
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2229-0
isbn_softcover978-1-4684-2231-3
isbn_ebook978-1-4684-2229-0
copyrightPlenum Press, New York 1976
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Genetics and the Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Genetics and the Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Genetics and the Law网络公开度




书目名称Genetics and the Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Genetics and the Law被引频次




书目名称Genetics and the Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Genetics and the Law年度引用




书目名称Genetics and the Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Genetics and the Law读者反馈




书目名称Genetics and the Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:09:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:33:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:47:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:11:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:53:10 | 显示全部楼层
Geneticophobia and the Implications of Screening for the XYY Genotype in Newborn Infantsve been subject to well publicized criticism because of the alleged consequences for infants (and their families) with XYY genotype detected in such studies (1–5). These criticisms have focused on some specific aspects of the Boston study, but they have much broader significance. Among other issues,
发表于 2025-3-22 20:55:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:23:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:15:09 | 显示全部楼层
Problems in Genetic Screening which Confront the Law important to review genetic screening as it is currently practiced and as it has arisen. This discussion will be confined to that screening for genetic disorders conducted routinely either on a specific age group (such as newborns) within an entire population or on a certain ethnic segment of a pop
发表于 2025-3-23 07:14:25 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 07:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表