找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Génér; Martin Schauer,Bea Verschraegen Book

[复制链接]
查看: 38450|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 17:27:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé
编辑Martin Schauer,Bea Verschraegen
视频video
概述The only work covering the convergences of legal doctrine on a broad range of issues, available on the market.Provides comparative analysis on a wide range of current problems from a global perspectiv
丛书名称Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law
图书封面Titlebook: General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Génér;  Martin Schauer,Bea Verschraegen Book
描述This book deals with convergences of legal doctrine despite jurisdictional, cultural, and political barriers, and of divergences due to such barriers, examining topics that are of vital importance to contemporary legal scholars. Written by leading scholars from more than twenty countries, its thirty-two chapters present a comparative analysis of cutting-edge legal topics of the 21st century. While each of the countries covered stands alone as a sovereign state, in a technologically advanced world their disparate systems nonetheless show comparable strategies in dealing with complex legal issues.    The book is a critical addition to the library of any scholar hoping to keep abreast of the major trends in contemporary law. It covers a vast area of topics that are dealt with from a comparative point of view and represents the current state of law in each area. ​
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Private Law and Fundamental Rights; Financial Crises; Disgorgement of Profits; Private Ordering in Fami
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1066-2
isbn_softcover978-94-024-1481-3
isbn_ebook978-94-024-1066-2Series ISSN 2214-6881 Series E-ISSN 2214-689X
issn_series 2214-6881
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé影响因子(影响力)




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé网络公开度




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé网络公开度学科排名




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé被引频次




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé被引频次学科排名




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé年度引用




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé年度引用学科排名




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé读者反馈




书目名称General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l‘Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:38:35 | 显示全部楼层
Judicial Rulings with Prospective Effects: From Comparison to Systematisation,evious arrangements made by a party to a case in accordance with long-standing precedents established previously by the courts. Against this background, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal in the recent past with the prospect of introducing to their own systems the well-established US practic
发表于 2025-3-22 01:07:03 | 显示全部楼层
Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention by National Courts,e United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, commonly known as the New York Convention. The Chapter surveys and synthesizes national responses to a sample of questions on major Convention topics: implementation of the Convention, enforcement of agreement
发表于 2025-3-22 05:00:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:47:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:02:10 | 显示全部楼层
Disgorgement of Profits: Gain-Based Remedies Throughout the World,w, unfair commercial practices law, capital market law, intellectual property rights, or personal rights by mass media, or the breach of fiduciary or confidentiality duties are—for various reasons—generally highly profitable for the wrongdoer. Thus, in practice unlawful conduct regularly pays as the
发表于 2025-3-22 21:08:15 | 显示全部楼层
Private Ordering in Family Law: A Global Perspective, substantive and procedural family law with regard to parents and children and with regard to life partners. The conclusions of the analysis are quite ambivalent. Firstly, whereas family law is clearly moving towards contract with regard to old family formations, the contrary is true for new family
发表于 2025-3-23 00:01:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:49:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:22:23 | 显示全部楼层
Civil and Commercial Mediation and National Courts: Towards a New Concept of Justice for the XXI Cer pressure because the volume of disputes brought before State courts increases, the proceedings are getting more and more lengthy and the costs incurred by the parties in such proceedings are also greatly increasing. This situation can impair the full implementation of the principle of access to ju
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 09:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表