Titlebook: Gender, Power and Political Speech; Women and Language i Deborah Cameron,Sylvia Shaw Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

Dopamine

书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech网络公开度




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech被引频次




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech被引频次学科排名




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech年度引用




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech年度引用学科排名




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech读者反馈




书目名称Gender, Power and Political Speech读者反馈学科排名

地牢

Gender and Speech Styles in the 2015 General Election Debates, in the GE2015 campaign. We consider the distribution of speaking turns and speaking time among participants, and examine the use they made of adversarial and cooperative/supportive strategies. The analysis shows that all participants employed a variety of strategies, though the range and balance wa

Commodious

Charade

Conclusions, It begins by revisiting the case study’s central questions: how the female party leaders used language in the televised GE2015 leaders’ debates, and how their behaviour related to the familiar ideological representation of women’s ‘different voice’. We then discuss the debates as media events, in w

漂浮

Book 2016who took part in televised debates during the 2015 UK General Election campaign. The analysis considers similarities and differences between the women and their male colleagues, as well as between the women themselves; it also discusses the way gender - and its relationship to language - was taken up as an issue in media coverage of the campaign. 

exceed

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7gender; women leaders; general election; televised political debates; women in politics; sociolinguistics

exceed

Why children come into hospital and a sociopolitical construct, and reviews research dealing with gender as an influence on verbal behaviour in political and other public or institutional settings. It then outlines the context and main events of the 2015 General Election campaign in the UK, including the two televised leaders’ de

引起痛苦

Carcinogen

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3400-8lysis identifies a number of key themes in this coverage—noting that both gender and gendered styles of speaking were among press commentators’ preoccupations—and discusses some of the rhetorical and linguistic devices that recurred in commentary on the women. While the personalized, trivializing, a

沙漠