Titlebook: Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe; Lise Rolandsen Agustín Book 2013 Lise Rolandsen Agust�n 2013 desegregation.EU

凝固

书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe网络公开度




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe被引频次




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe被引频次学科排名




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe年度引用




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe年度引用学科排名




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe读者反馈




书目名称Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe读者反馈学科排名

无孔

Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe978-1-137-02810-5Series ISSN 2945-6096 Series E-ISSN 2945-610X

本能

Book 2013Gender is being marginalized with the increased attention to "multiple discrimination" and civil society landscape at the transnational level is increasingly diversified. The book looks at the processes of (strategic) degendering in EU policy-making and on the interaction between EU institutions and European women‘s organizations.

尊重

哺乳动物

流浪

流浪

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137272720on or belief, disability, age, and sexual orientation), antidiscrimination and multiple discrimination were cemented on the political agenda and policy-making processes of the EU. New legislation was introduced with the aim of putting the different grounds of discrimination on an equal footing in te

松软

foodstuff

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43332-1m Treaty was, in particular, expressed through civil society organizations’ concern over the potential downplaying or disappearance of gender as a consequence of increased attention to diversity and multiple inequalities. The following three chapters will address the challenge of degendering in term

TSH582

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49935-8t of structural gender inequality, women’s rights as human rights, or public health. On the one hand, these differences can be attributed to the institutional authorship of the texts, as the EP documents articulate frames related to gender equality and human rights whereas the EC focuses on public h