找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy; Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Me

[复制链接]
查看: 6908|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 17:06:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy
编辑Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim
视频video
概述The first book to collect multidisciplinary research on game-theoretic methods in logic, language and philosophy.Brings forward philosophical aspects of games in relation to logic and language, unlike
丛书名称Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy;  Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Me
描述OndrejMajer,Ahti-VeikkoPietarinen,andTeroTulenheimo 1 Games and logic in philosophy Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in the unifying methodo- gies over what have been perceived as pretty disparate logical ‘systems’, or else merely an assortment of formal and mathematical ‘approaches’ to phi- sophical inquiry. This development has largely been fueled by an increasing dissatisfaction to what has earlier been taken to be a straightforward outcome of ‘logical pluralism’ or ‘methodological diversity’. These phrases appear to re ect the everyday chaos of our academic pursuits rather than any genuine attempt to clarify the general principles underlying the miscellaneous ways in which logic appears to us. But the situation is changing. Unity among plurality is emerging in c- temporary studies in logical philosophy and neighbouring disciplines. This is a necessary follow-up to the intensive research into the intricacies of logical systems and methodologies performed over the recent years. The present book suggests one such peculiar but very unrestrained meth- ological perspective over the eld of logic and its applications in mathematics, language or computation: games. An alle
出版日期Book 2009
关键词discourse; game theory; interaction; language; logic; semantic; semantics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9374-6
isbn_softcover978-90-481-8115-5
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-9374-6Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy网络公开度




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy被引频次




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy年度引用




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy读者反馈




书目名称Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:16:39 | 显示全部楼层
The Problem of Determinacy of Infinite Games from an Intuitionistic Point of Viewrns out that every subset of a space, where player . has, for each one of his moves, no more than a finite number of alternative possibilities while player . perhaps has infinitely many choices, is determinate in the proposed sense from the viewpoint of player ..
发表于 2025-3-22 03:36:58 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2009hodo- gies over what have been perceived as pretty disparate logical ‘systems’, or else merely an assortment of formal and mathematical ‘approaches’ to phi- sophical inquiry. This development has largely been fueled by an increasing dissatisfaction to what has earlier been taken to be a straightforw
发表于 2025-3-22 05:33:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:29:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:14:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:59:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:11:07 | 显示全部楼层
Analysis of Data from an ,-of-1 Trial,lief formation practices implicit in epistemic characterization theorems, however, disregard all information about players except what can be found in the game itself. Such a practice of belief formation is implausible.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:20:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:04:28 | 显示全部楼层
Why Play Logical Games?ainst Hintikka games, I focus on Lorenzen‘s attempt at providing a direct foundation for his game rules in the life-world, showing some of the difficulties inherent to that project. I then propose an alternative based on the theory of assertions developed by Dummett and Brandom.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 23:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表