Titlebook: Game Theory and Pragmatics; Anton Benz (Assistant Professor of Humanistic Info Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publi

迅速

书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics网络公开度




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics被引频次




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics年度引用




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics读者反馈




书目名称Game Theory and Pragmatics读者反馈学科排名

artless

Saying and Meaning, Cheap Talk and Credibility, The . sharply criticized him for ‘playing with fire,’ and characterized his remarks as ‘dumping on his own currency’, ‘bashing the dollar,’ and ‘talking the dollar down’. What he in fact said was this: ‘When the dollar is at a lower level it helps exports, and I think exports are getting stronger a

Valves

Pragmatics and Games of Partial Information,ikh (2001), where I considered their use in modeling communication, speaker meaning, and information flow. In this chapter, I look at a medley of topics, some in more detail and others in an exploratory vein. I first clarify some aspects of the basic model in the context of literal content that appe

恶心

Game Theory and Communication,theoretic approach to communication are briefly investigated. In the second part, one of the most fully developed game-theoretic accounts of communication is examined: Prashant Parikh’s post-Gricean utterance-by-utterance account (Parikh 1990, 1991, 2001). Doubts are raised about some of the aspects

CRACY

Pragmatic Reasoning, Defaults and Discourse Structure,hat combines an account of rhetorical structure with dynamic semantics. In particular we argue for a rich, . notion of discourse context which we compute by means of simple defeasible rules in a nonmonotonic propositional logic. These defaults are linguistic in nature but have access to nonlinguisti

宣称

Utility and Relevance of Answers,sked ‘.?’, reactions may range from ‘.’, ‘.’, over ‘., ‘.’, to ‘.’, or even ‘.’. This paper divides into two parts. The goal of the first part is to derive a measure of utility for answers from a game theoretic model of communication. We apply this measure to account for a number of judgements about

宣称

无王时期,

A Game Theoretic Approach to the Pragmatics of Debate: An Expository Note, the listener, to adopt his position by raising arguments in his favor. We are interested in the logic behind the relative strength of the arguments and counterarguments; we therefore limit our discussion to debates in which one side is asked to argue first, with the other party having the right to

incredulity

On the Evolutionary Dynamics of Meaning-Word Associations, regarding the underlying mechanisms of language acquisition were used to explain both the origin of vocabulary and grammatical constructs. In general the idea is that through social interactions stable language dispositions, like meaning-word associations, spread through a population of agents. The

直言不讳