Titlebook: Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof; The Background, Cont William A. Wallace Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992 Ga

Aprope

警告

Oliver Huxhold,Clemens Tesch-Römerfrom that of the present day. Its predominant characteristic was its very stringent requirements for certitude and infallibility, requirements that set it apart from opinion, which results from probable reasoning and is revisable whenever more plausible arguments become available. In view of Galileo

labile

描绘

Gabriele Doblhammer,Uta Ziegler part of our study, that relating to his actual use of the scientific methodology it implies, his ... Before citing specific examples of such use we would stress a point made earlier, one on which Zabarella, Vallius, and Galileo all agree, namely, that there is a vast difference between . and . [Sec

cacophony

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04779-8 based. Yet, at the time he published the ., he lacked, or at least did not have in usable form, a terrestrial mechanics that could integrate these data within a systematic structure. Earlier his experimental genius and his skill at developing measuring techniques had stood him in good stead when he

Generosity

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359086l finding is quite simple: that Galileo employed the demonstrative regress of the Paduan Aristotelians, transmitted to him via the lecture notes of Jesuits at the Collegio Romano, to give causal explanations of phenomena he was the first to discover in the emerging sciences of astronomy and mechanic

元音

sleep-spindles

Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof978-94-015-8040-3Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

bonnet

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8040-3Galileo Galilei; logic; science

Extemporize

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23524-7eries in a general way; its aim is to give an overview of Galileo’s views on logic as explained in this volume and thus introduce the reader to the more detailed discussions to be found in the chapters to follow.