找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract; A Comparative Analys Daniel Zatorski Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[复制链接]
查看: 54404|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 19:18:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract
副标题A Comparative Analys
编辑Daniel Zatorski
视频video
概述Provides a comparative analysis of an emerging problem in contract law.Applies to the work of common law and civil law pracitioners alike.Focuses on both English law and Polish law
图书封面Titlebook: Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract; A Comparative Analys Daniel Zatorski Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),
描述.This book focuses on an emerging problem in English contract law: what should be done when a party has been unjustly enriched as the result of a breach of contract but there is no measurable loss suffered by said party? Two rulings are at the heart of the book: Wrotham Park Estate v Parkside Homes and Attorney-General v Blake. These two cases can be said to have established gain-based remedies in English contract law. However, the principles that underpin these remedies are not entirely clear and are subject to debate..This book analyses these principles through the lens of compensatory and restitutionary approaches. Moreover, it applies a comparative analysis of these approaches through the lens of the civil law jurisdiction in Poland..Since the term ‘compensation’ is not a universal concept, the book distinguishes between two rationales in the compensatory analysis. The first, reparative compensation, is defined as a form of monetary recompense for loss or damage actually suffered. The second, substitutive compensation, represents a monetary equivalent to a right that a person has been deprived of or denied. Both rationales require the application of a broad notion of loss in or
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Gain-Based Remedies; Breach Of Contract; Disgorgement; Damages; Unjust Enrichment; compensatory principle
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25452-9
isbn_softcover978-3-031-25454-3
isbn_ebook978-3-031-25452-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract网络公开度




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract被引频次




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract被引频次学科排名




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract年度引用




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract年度引用学科排名




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract读者反馈




书目名称Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:47:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:24:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:55:37 | 显示全部楼层
Gain-Based Remedies for Breach of Contract in General, most notable for shaping these remedies. Firstly, the 1973 case of . in which Steyn LJ awarded so-called . which are “assessed according to the price which the claimant could reasonably have charged the defendant for releasing the defendant from the obligation that has been broken had the defendant
发表于 2025-3-22 12:08:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:52:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:25:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:50:33 | 显示全部楼层
Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrateslish legal system. To illustrate this in greater detail, under English law the normal route to take when a contract is breached is for the claimant to claim damages for the loss suffered. Such a route becomes more complicated when the claimant does not suffer any measurable loss, and yet the defenda
发表于 2025-3-23 02:00:42 | 显示全部楼层
Ying-Chan Tang,Fen-May Liou,Sheng-Yao Pengt the . and . remedies are compensatory. To make this clear, when writing about both the . remedy and the . remedy together, I will refer to them as .. When writing individually about these cases, I will refer to the . remedy as ., while to the . remedy as .. The comparative argument I wish to put f
发表于 2025-3-23 05:53:47 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 04:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表