Titlebook: EU Rule of Law Procedures at the Test Bench; Managing Dissensus i Cristina Fasone,Adriano Dirri,Ylenia Guerra Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if a

鬼魂

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16396-3ject of the volume and the conceptual framework. Indeed, the book critically assesses the EU rule of law instruments from the standpoint of their respective procedure of enforcement, with a special focus on the interplay, overlappings and synergies between them in tackling the rule of law backslidin

人类学家

Ronald Hitzler,Gregor Betz,Arne Niederbacherde in the midst of a rule of law crisis and a growing dissensus over liberal democracy. The chapter is organised as follows: Sect. . reviews the origins of Article 7 TEU. Section . discusses the major legal and political disputes surrounding this procedure since 2010, and Sect. . looks at the ongoin

antiquated

Stefano Di Vita,Corinna Morandiuch systemic threats. The solid background of its practice, the leverage granted by fines and the lack of political filter are all pros supporting its application in such context. The recent practice related to Poland also showed the reference to the violation of the democratic principles, opening a

CLAN

Yu-Min Joo,Yooil Bae,Eva Kassens-Noord in the European Union by paying particular attention to the potentialities and limits of this procedure, as highlighted by the academic literature. It is suggested that the preliminary reference procedure has not only served as a procedural tool through which the dissensus has been “channelled” bu

Hippocampus