Titlebook: Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy; James N. Szymalak Book 2019 The Editor(s) (

Prophylaxis

nauseate

Conclusion,rs workplace participation of a disadvantaged minority, religious accommodation privileges non-performance—potentially to the public’s detriment. Few would think less of their government for reducing employment barriers for the disabled; conversely, condoning service denials motivated by religious disapproval would create negative perceptions.

pericardium

James N. SzymalakBroadens the current post-Obergefell discussion of employee religious accommodation to consider the third-party impacts on public administration.Illuminates the myriad legal and supervisory challenges

牛马之尿

Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318684.jpg

adduction

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97831-4religious accommodation; public service and religion; organizational theory public service; Religious F

天真

低位的人或事

Louis de Koker,Doron GoldbarshtAs previously explained, the employer’s obligation to accommodate religious expression is quite limited. Minimal disruption to operations will be sufficient to avoid having to accommodate the religious beliefs and practices of employees, to include requiring them to perform duties to which they refuse on religious grounds.

Myocyte

Michael Kodom,Daniel Osarfo,Peter QuarteyThe previous chapter sought to explain the requirements of a heighten duty to accommodate, but what would that actually look like? Politically motivated rhetoric can easily become attenuated from the actual impacts of proposed legislation, and it appears that is what is happening in regards to protecting religious free expression.

慢慢流出

Affirm