找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy; James N. Szymalak Book 2019 The Editor(s) (

[复制链接]
查看: 11168|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 18:08:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy
编辑James N. Szymalak
视频video
概述Broadens the current post-Obergefell discussion of employee religious accommodation to consider the third-party impacts on public administration.Illuminates the myriad legal and supervisory challenges
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy
图书封面Titlebook: Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy;  James N. Szymalak Book 2019 The Editor(s) (
描述In the wake of same-sex marriage legalization, most religious conservatives realize that they now share a minority viewpoint on many social issues. Such change has forced those formerly trying to forestall social evolution to instead seek legal recusal from engaging in matters that conflict with their religious beliefs. Not surprisingly, these recent legislative attempts to “affirm” religious free expression all focus upon the rights of the religious adherent, while mostly failing to consider the potential harm to third parties. In the provision of government services, this omission can do significant, lasting damage to public perceptions of administrative legitimacy—often already perilously maligned. Should government officials be legally obligated to grant their employees religious accommodations that they know will result in negative public perceptions, or worse, inflict dignitary harm among citizens seeking its services? This book draws attention to the threat to effective government that proposed expansions to religious accommodation laws can create. From damaging public opinion, to the myriad implementation concerns such as what even constitutes a religious belief to be accom
出版日期Book 2019
关键词religious accommodation; public service and religion; organizational theory public service; Religious F
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97831-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-07412-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-97831-4Series ISSN 2731-6769 Series E-ISSN 2731-6777
issn_series 2731-6769
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy网络公开度




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy被引频次




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy年度引用




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy读者反馈




书目名称Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:08:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:21:32 | 显示全部楼层
Expanding Public Employee Religious Accommodation and Its Threat to Administrative Legitimacy
发表于 2025-3-22 07:39:27 | 显示全部楼层
2731-6769 tion.Illuminates the myriad legal and supervisory challengesIn the wake of same-sex marriage legalization, most religious conservatives realize that they now share a minority viewpoint on many social issues. Such change has forced those formerly trying to forestall social evolution to instead seek l
发表于 2025-3-22 10:09:08 | 显示全部楼层
Nazneen Fatima,Krittika Banerjeened ambiguity in defining religion, this chapter highlights the difficulty for front-line managers—many of whom have minimal, or no, supervisory training—trying to determine whether the requested accommodation is proper.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:18:55 | 显示全部楼层
Challenges of an Expanded Obligation,ned ambiguity in defining religion, this chapter highlights the difficulty for front-line managers—many of whom have minimal, or no, supervisory training—trying to determine whether the requested accommodation is proper.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:16:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:46:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:47:02 | 显示全部楼层
Rhianna Hamilton,Christian Leuprechton” likely resembles their own, or widely known, religious beliefs and practices, and they are often unaware of just how amorphous the legal definition has to be to avoid Establishment Clause concerns.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:34:15 | 显示全部楼层
Nazneen Fatima,Krittika Banerjeend that an expanded obligation to accommodate religion in the workplace presents myriad implementation challenges. Building upon the previously explained ambiguity in defining religion, this chapter highlights the difficulty for front-line managers—many of whom have minimal, or no, supervisory train
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-8 15:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表