Titlebook: Examining Neurocritical Patients; Eelco F. M. Wijdicks Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license

反对

Clinical Course and Anticipating Outcome,of individual neurologic symptoms, and finally, providing prognostic information organized by specific neurologic pathology. Outcome determination is what we do and based on findings on repeat clinical assessment. Outcome generally is determined at onset, but another injury from a complication may j

Feature

Communicating Clinical Findings,ve communication skills, and how to acquire the necessary skills to resolve ambiguities. The argument I like to make is that our clinical neurologic examination may become meaningless without personal face-to-face communication. It often involves physician-to-neurointensivist interactions, but the p

或者发神韵

蚊帐

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318213.jpg

Nonflammable

Kazuya Yoshida,Satoshi Tadokoroation. Obtaining a reliable history requires the collaboration of a bystander or a close family member. Summarizing a medical history for the first time places a tremendous burden, often underappreciated by clinicians. Examples of the value of a good medical history are shown, but also the familiar

休闲

Pedro Piniés,Lina Maria Paz,Paul Newmana larger ICU population. These scales mostly quantify abnormal levels of consciousness, acute confusional states, or delirium. Their use in practice is unknown, although some scales and scores are now mandated in stroke centers. Many scores and scales have not been validated repeatedly, and one (in-

refine

Receive

Postulate

Eugene A. Olevsky,Dina V. Dudinalay. Questions arise when parts of the examination do not fit with what has been traditionally known from the standards of localization. We must continually ask ourselves constantly whether our examination accurately reflects what is happening to the patient. Good clinical acumen may improve our int

Altitude