找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Examining Ethics in Contemporary Science Education Research; Being Responsive and Kathrin Otrel-Cass,Maria Andrée,Minjung Ryu Book 2020 Spr

[复制链接]
楼主: 乳钵
发表于 2025-3-25 04:07:50 | 显示全部楼层
Field Crop Pests in the Near Eastnce, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning in ways which previously were either impossible, high-priced, or impractical. The potential access that low-cost and ever-smaller recorders provide us has been wisely tempered with cautions that researchers critically reflect on whether t
发表于 2025-3-25 10:03:19 | 显示全部楼层
Joseph Disi,Jocelyn Simmons,Simon Zebelon has particular societal and political consequences, research has to be undertaken with much care and responsibility. The chapter problematises ritualised ethical practices that may inadvertently neglect the subtle adjustments that need to be taken ‘on the go’. Drawing on Max Scheler’s material val
发表于 2025-3-25 14:58:56 | 显示全部楼层
Springer Series in Advanced Microelectronicsabout science education. It will be proposed that these recent works suggests that, for some important dimensions, the focus of the field is shifting away from the researcher and from simple, macro-level considerations to more equitable relationships and to more complex, micro-level, multidisciplina
发表于 2025-3-25 16:06:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:46:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:18:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:36:32 | 显示全部楼层
Sleight of Hand: Maupassant and , Peirce’s pragmatic maxim is interpreted as a relevance test that directs the researcher towards practical consequences of research. Dewey supports Peirce’s practice orientation with an understanding of science that circumvents the traditional opposition between objectivity of knowledge and value-la
发表于 2025-3-26 09:55:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:41:05 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403976802his tool may contribute to deeper descriptions and understandings of educational practices. Finally, we discuss the affordances of a tool that incorporates values into the analysis of educational practices in light of research ethics.
发表于 2025-3-26 16:55:58 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 03:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表