找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evidence, Policy and Wellbeing; Ian Bache Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer N

[复制链接]
楼主: bile-acids
发表于 2025-3-25 04:44:44 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,ted nature of wellbeing. It also considers the significance of recent wellbeing initiatives internationally and nationally, including those in the devolved jurisdictions of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:20:16 | 显示全部楼层
Thu Trang Vu,Dung Vu,Thi Mai Lan Nguyenecent decades and different terms and concepts developed to capture this relationship. It then provides an overview of extant research on other What Works Centre policy areas that informed the research design for the empirical material collected for this book.
发表于 2025-3-25 11:52:36 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5591-9of the What Works Centre for Wellbeing in 2015. It then turns to the role of wellbeing in policy, providing examples of evidence on different drivers of wellbeing and on life satisfaction (a key indicator of SWB). The chapter concludes by drawing together some of the key themes and issues that inform subsequent chapters.
发表于 2025-3-25 18:45:42 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92536-3e of purposes. The findings suggest the need for a broad understanding of ‘what works’ beyond the rational-technical sense often employed to describe the work of What Works Centres and in the use of evidence more generally.
发表于 2025-3-25 22:06:26 | 显示全部楼层
Analytische und interpretative Grundlagenolerable costs, public acquiescence and receptivity among elected decision-makers. The findings indicate that while evidence may have obvious relevance to some criteria for survival than for others, it plays a role across all of the criteria—some of which are more closely related than previously acknowledged.
发表于 2025-3-26 04:05:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:25:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:36:21 | 显示全部楼层
,‘What Works’ for Wellbeing?,e of purposes. The findings suggest the need for a broad understanding of ‘what works’ beyond the rational-technical sense often employed to describe the work of What Works Centres and in the use of evidence more generally.
发表于 2025-3-26 13:48:39 | 显示全部楼层
Evidence in the Policy Stream: The Multiple Streams Approach,olerable costs, public acquiescence and receptivity among elected decision-makers. The findings indicate that while evidence may have obvious relevance to some criteria for survival than for others, it plays a role across all of the criteria—some of which are more closely related than previously acknowledged.
发表于 2025-3-26 19:27:44 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 16:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表