Titlebook: Evidence and Expertise in Nordic Education Policy; A Comparative Networ Berit Karseth,Kirsten Sivesind,Gita Steiner-Khamsi Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 202

呼吸

Debark

vidence for their policy decisions.Is methodologically sophi.This open access book explores how policy makers draw on national, regional and international expertise in issuing school reform within five Nordic countries. In an era of international comparison, policy makers are expected to review best

脱毛

Paweł Latosiński,Andrzej Bartoszewicz Nordic countries. Key concepts such as networks, nodes, edges, centrality, and density are defined, and the rationale and procedures for collecting, analyzing, and presenting data are described in detail. This chapter also acknowledges the limitations in its methodological approach and proposes the direction for future studies.

Lacerate

使隔离

Structuring School Reform Policy with Evidence: The Inter-mediational Role of Knowledge Sources andthe most often co-cited references and their argumentative use as evidence. They conclude that the reports bring together systems of reasoning that in practice are highly differentiated but in policy are aligned with each other. Moreover, evidence serves an inter-mediational role by shaping policy options connecting both policy realms and systems.

过分

Evidence-Based Policymaking in Nordic Countries: Different Settings, Different Practices?, their policy proposals; however, their utilization varies by (1) institutionalized forms of policymaking system, (2) degree of self-referentiality, and (3) type of reform. This comparative study offers timely reflections on how the discourse of evidence-based policymaking is interpreted and adapted differently across countries.

Folklore

和平

IRK

Julie Gaburro,Saeid Nahavandi,Asim Bhattiauthorize evidence in their attempt to propose reform agendas and issue school reforms in their respective countries? The chapter provides an overview of the book and summarizes each of the following chapters.

Amnesty

Anne O’Neil,Kerry Lunney,Melissa Jovicario, which heavily influenced the reform contents. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the findings and presents a very uneven evidence landscape consisting mainly of what-works types of evidence and a distinct absence of broader types of evidence.