找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models; Essays by and in Hon Mostapha Diss,Vincent Merlin Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland

[复制链接]
查看: 13546|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 20:02:39 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models
副标题Essays by and in Hon
编辑Mostapha Diss,Vincent Merlin
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317249/317249.mp4
概述Presents recent research on the analysis of voting rules using the probability approach.Follows up on recent books by Gehrlein and Lepelley in the same book series.Pays tribute to William Gehrlein’s a
丛书名称Studies in Choice and Welfare
图书封面Titlebook: Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models; Essays by and in Hon Mostapha Diss,Vincent Merlin Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland
描述.This book includes up-to-date contributions in the broadly defined area of probabilistic analysis of voting rules and decision mechanisms. Featuring papers from all fields of social choice and game theory, it presents probability arguments to allow readers to gain a better understanding of the properties of decision rules and of the functioning of modern democracies. In particular, it focuses on the legacy of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley, two prominent scholars who have made important contributions to this field over the last fifty years. It covers a range of topics, including (but not limited to) computational and technical aspects of probability approaches, evaluation of the likelihood of voting paradoxes, power indices, empirical evaluations of voting rules, models of voters’ behavior, and strategic voting. The book gathers articles written in honor of Gehrlein and Lepelley along with original works written by the two scholars themselves..
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Voting Rules; Voting Systems; Democracy; Elections; Electoral Systems; Probability; Social Choice Theory; P
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-48600-6
isbn_ebook978-3-030-48598-6Series ISSN 1614-0311 Series E-ISSN 2197-8530
issn_series 1614-0311
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models网络公开度




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models被引频次




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models被引频次学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models年度引用




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models年度引用学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models读者反馈




书目名称Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:37:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:42:42 | 显示全部楼层
Condorcet Efficiency of General Weighted Scoring Rules Under IAC: Indifference and Abstentionreferences impact the performances of voting rules is a natural question addressed in the literature. We reconsider this question with respect to one of the main characteristics of a voting rule: its Condorcet efficiency; that is, the conditional probability that the rule selects a Condorcet winner
发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:49 | 显示全部楼层
The Effect of Closeness on the Election of a Pairwise Majority Rule Winner three-candidate elections under Scoring Elimination Rules. It was shown that the frequency of such a paradox significantly increases as elections become more closely contested. In this chapter we consider the effect of closeness on one of the most studied notions in social choice theory: The electi
发表于 2025-3-22 11:38:01 | 显示全部楼层
Analyzing the Practical Relevance of the Condorcet Loser Paradox and the Agenda Contraction Paradoxchapter, we investigate the likelihood of the Condorcet Loser Paradox (CLP) and the Agenda Contraction Paradox (ACP) using Ehrhart theory, computer simulations, and empirical data. We present the first analytical results for the CLP on four alternatives and show that our experimental results, which
发表于 2025-3-22 15:47:30 | 显示全部楼层
On the Probability of the Ostrogorski Paradoxup decision-making situations. This phenomenon cannot be observed in two-issue situations, and when three-issue situations are considered, the probability that such an outcome will be observed never reaches a likelihood of as much as two percent for large electorates, regardless of the propensity of
发表于 2025-3-22 17:45:57 | 显示全部楼层
Violations of Reversal Symmetry Under Simple and Runoff Scoring Rulesare reversed. We study the vulnerability—in terms of frequencies of violation—of a set of usual and well-known simple and runoff scoring rules to the violation of reversal symmetry. We show that the pattern of the results is very different depending on whether the rule under consideration is a simpl
发表于 2025-3-22 23:18:53 | 显示全部楼层
Majority Efficient Representation of the Citizens in a Federal Unionapply a majority criterion to evaluate these voting rules: An apportionment of the seats among the states is majority efficient if it minimizes the probability of electing the candidate who receives less than 50% of the votes in a two candidate competition over the whole union. Depending on the assu
发表于 2025-3-23 01:34:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:42:04 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-17 02:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表