Titlebook: Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans; National Actions for James C. White,Wendy H. Petry,William R. Wagner Book 1996 Plenum Press, New Y

HEMI

书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans网络公开度




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans被引频次




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans被引频次学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans年度引用




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans年度引用学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans读者反馈




书目名称Evaluating Climate Chanage Action Plans读者反馈学科排名

发牢骚

The United States Perspective,red before, but it was some years ago, and things were a little different then, which leads me to a few remarks today about the kinds of things we have been through in terms of the climate issue over the past five or six years.

拖债

maladorit

比目鱼

GONG

Luncheon Discussion with Karl Hausker,oing it?. I like to think of the programs in two basic categories. One is focused on some end use practice, like more efficient lighting technology, more efficient motors, and plugging natural gas leaks. In many cases, EPA or DOE can provide information that will reduce the transaction cost to a fir

GONG

Perspectives on the U.S. Climate Action Plan,fectuate the Department’s policy objectives. We have long considered ourselves the deployment arm of the Department when it comes to new energy technologies, and agreed to work cooperatively with the Department in this area.

Infusion

The Environmental Perspective, try to evaluate the plan and its overall adequacy for meeting, not only the near-term commitment that President Clinton announced, to return emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000, but the ultimate objective of the Climate Treaty itself, which is quite different. That objective is to stabilize t

installment

diathermy

Session II Discussion with Robert Beck, John Hemphill, Daniel Lashof, and David Rinebolt,e voluntary approach that’s been taken in the U.S. plan. There are definitely differences of degree there, concerns expressed that it’s not enough, and a variety of things have been listed as additional steps that could be taken: increased efficiency, an auto fuel economy emphasis, stationary source