Titlebook: European Cosmopolitanism in Question; Roland Robertson,Anne Sophie Krossa Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

commotion

书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question影响因子(影响力)




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question网络公开度




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question网络公开度学科排名




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question被引频次




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question被引频次学科排名




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question年度引用




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question年度引用学科排名




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question读者反馈




书目名称European Cosmopolitanism in Question读者反馈学科排名

四目在模仿

Cosmopolitanism As a Concept for Tolerant Demarcation,ition of otherness to a maxim, a concealed excessive increase of universalism is at work. What gets lost on the way is the recursive capacity of cosmopolitanism to recognize the justifiable difference of the Other, and to require a distinct collective identity. Only such self-restraint makes possibl

Immunotherapy

Cosmopolitan Liberalism and Its Limits, shape their distribution and use. There is a tension running through modern history between struggles to open new individual opportunities — for those with the resources to take them up — and struggles to transform social structures to benefit those much less well off. Both of these struggles are i

转换

The Obama Effect: Confronting the Political and the Cosmopolitics of the Real,embattled (Robbins, 1998; R. Werbner, 2008). Cosmopolitans are actors in a highly contested political field. Moreover, as I have argued recently (P. Werbner, 2008), cosmopolitanism is not restricted to the West. In the developing world both elites and non-elites may foster cosmopolitan visions, and

有抱负者

雄伟

Divided Time: Notes on Cosmopolitanism and the Theory of Second Modernity,

雄伟

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36975-3upon (Benhabib, 2004; Bohman, 2007; Habermas, 2006). Cosmopolitan social science — or, more pertinently for this chapter, cosmopolitan social theory — is now a rightful occupant of our increasingly cosmopolitan intellectual landscapes.

Abbreviate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48548-0ition of otherness to a maxim, a concealed excessive increase of universalism is at work. What gets lost on the way is the recursive capacity of cosmopolitanism to recognize the justifiable difference of the Other, and to require a distinct collective identity. Only such self-restraint makes possibl

nettle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05096-4 shape their distribution and use. There is a tension running through modern history between struggles to open new individual opportunities — for those with the resources to take them up — and struggles to transform social structures to benefit those much less well off. Both of these struggles are i

scotoma