找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws; Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A

[复制链接]
查看: 42023|回复: 55
发表于 2025-3-21 17:40:18 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws
编辑Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski
视频video
概述Presents a unique comparative analysis of all judgments of European constitutional courts as well as the ECJ and ECHR in the matter of Data Retention Law.Offers an interdisciplinary study of data rete
丛书名称Law, Governance and Technology Series
图书封面Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws;  Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A
描述.The book analyses the impact the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of EU Member States and the Court of Justice of the European Union has had on the perception of freedom of communications in the digital era with respect to these courts’ judgments regarding regulating storage and access to telecommunications data (known as telecommunications data retention) from 2008 to 2017. To do so, it examines the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, i.e. those courts that have already ruled on domestic provisions regulating telecommunications data retention. Further, it investigates the judgments of the Court of Justice of European Union regarding directive 2006/24/EC regulating telecommunications data retention along with relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. As such, the book provides a comparative study of jurisprudence and national measures to implement the Data Retention Directive...Moreover, the book discusses whether our current understanding of protection of freedom of communications guaranteed by the constitutions of EU member state
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Data Retention; Mass Surveillance Mechanism; Data Retention Directive; Digital Rights Ireland; Privacy; N
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57189-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-57191-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-57189-4Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910
issn_series 2352-1902
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影响因子(影响力)




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws网络公开度




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws网络公开度学科排名




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引频次




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引频次学科排名




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用学科排名




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws读者反馈




书目名称European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:19:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:37:38 | 显示全部楼层
Freedom of Communication and Data Retention in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rightste authorities. Attention was also paid to legal guarantees of freedom of communication, which should assist similar development of surveillance tools. Finally, an attempt was made to forecast in which direction the case law of the Court will follow in the coming years and how the technology develop
发表于 2025-3-22 07:31:07 | 显示全部楼层
Data Retention in Cyprus in the Light of EU Data Retention Lawurt orders allowing access to retained data even after a more recent CJEU judgement in which a general and indiscriminate data retention obligation has explicitly been stated to be incompatible with the EU Charter. The chapter finishes with a discussion on the possible practical effects of the 2018
发表于 2025-3-22 12:39:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:58:40 | 显示全部楼层
Data Retention in Germanystion to what extent the legislator may impose obligations on telecommunications service companies, among others on anonymisation services. This chapter explains how the DRD was implemented in Germany, describes the proceedings before the FCC and analyses its judgment in detail, together with a numb
发表于 2025-3-22 19:49:48 | 显示全部楼层
Data Retention in Irelandfeguards, including prior review by a court or independent administrative authority. This judgment, which is now under appeal and the subject of a reference to the Court of Justice, illustrates many of the very real challenges arising from the Court of Justice’s jurisprudence in this field. Yet, for
发表于 2025-3-22 21:31:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:02:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:30:03 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 02:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表