找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Eugenics and the Nature-Nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century; Aaron Gillette Book 2007 Aaron Gillette 2007 20. Jahrhundert.20th century

[复制链接]
楼主: 闪烁
发表于 2025-3-27 00:58:22 | 显示全部楼层
Evolutionary Psychology under Attacknism were put off by the elitist presumptions and racist overtones of eugenics. Rather, the environmental behaviorists offered a paradigm that seemed to suggest much more open possibilities in human potential. In essence, environmental behaviorism seemed to be more liberal, and a more fitting scientific ideology for liberal minded Americans..
发表于 2025-3-27 02:45:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 08:55:25 | 显示全部楼层
The Animal Nature of Humans seem to lead inevitably to new discoveries in biology whenever they have been applied. What is perhaps even more astounding is that some of his most logical ideas were to a great extent eventually dismissed and forgotten. In the mid-nineteenth century, Darwin quite reasonably assumed that, since hu
发表于 2025-3-27 11:40:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 15:10:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 20:35:56 | 显示全部楼层
The Rise of Environmental Behaviorismee of mental filtering and processing that shapes their perception. Certainly, observers differ in their interpretation of nature. This may be due, in part, to temperament, to background, to conviction, or to training. Institutional culture and historical trends also influence the questions scientis
发表于 2025-3-27 23:03:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 02:17:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:00:55 | 显示全部楼层
Lost in the Wildernessery unwise to have considered wandering into such an ideological minefield.. Most scientists depended on their professional employment for their financial security. And the Cold War atmosphere after the war did not induce many to risk their jobs and public reputation by stepping very far outside the
发表于 2025-3-28 11:36:18 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusioner called sociobiology and evolutionary psychology. A number of scientists at the time were on the right track when it came to scientific discovery, although often motivated by the wrong reasons ethically. Nevertheless, their legitimate scientific work should have been considered on its own merits,
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-12 22:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表