找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education; Robyn Brandenburg,Sharon McDonough Book 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte

[复制链接]
楼主: invigorating
发表于 2025-3-28 16:58:07 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303072 (p. 135) highlights the inherent challenges when considering issues of ethics in self-study research. While we might seek to identify ethical tensions, issues and dilemmas in advance, as we see from the contributions in this volume, the consideration of ethics is a dynamic, emergent and reflective
发表于 2025-3-28 19:56:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 00:39:53 | 显示全部楼层
Returning to First Principles: Self-Study and , as Ethical Approaches to Teaching,w Boards, IRBs, may adopt strangely inconsistent stances – either claiming that doing self-study research will automatically cause an unmanageable power imbalance within a teacher education program or claiming that self-study work does not require ethical review because it is not actually research.
发表于 2025-3-29 04:01:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 08:00:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 13:16:03 | 显示全部楼层
Navigating a Mirror Maze While Managing to Jump Ethics Hurdles, journey from practitioner to practitioner researcher, through the use of self-study as a research methdology. It provides a framework to support other practitioners wanting to make the same journey to practitioner researcher, and suggests ways to attend to the ethical dilemmas created by the tensio
发表于 2025-3-29 16:31:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 20:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表