Titlebook: Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence; Alfredo González-Ruibal,Gabriel Moshenska Book 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

不规则

舰旗

Cognitive Dissonance and the Military-Archaeology Complex,ergovernmental body. As such, there is an inherent risk that an investigation will be politicized and be subject to the label of “Victor’s Justice.” This chapter presents several cases that employed forensic archaeological expertise in conflict contexts and explores the ethical implications of the a

使纠缠

anthesis

Virtues Impracticable and Extremely Difficult: The Human Rights of Subsistence Diggers,ical sites, and how political and legal weaknesses enable and are perpetuated by illicit trading. It considers the logic and effectiveness of shoot-to-kill policing of theft of cultural property, the deterrent effect of armed guarding of cultural heritage sites, and the potential for sustainable cul

喊叫

Book 2015alyses and pertinent case studies from around the world it aims to address the problems facing archaeologists working in areas of violent conflict, past and present. Of all the contentious issues within archaeology and heritage, the study of conflict and work within conflict zones are undoubtedly th

bifurcate

2730-6925 painfully real ethical dilemmas that archaeologists are forc.This volume examines the distinctive and highly problematic ethical questions surrounding conflict archaeology. By bringing together sophisticated analyses and pertinent case studies from around the world it aims to address the problems fa

过分

BUCK

重力

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3276-7clusion, this chapter argues that archaeological interpretation should not be removed from political context but must be explicitly embedded within it wherever and whenever it is discussed and published.

flutter

eology of the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and the subsequent dictatorship. We will consider research on both battlefields and mass graves and the particular ethical dilemmas presented by these contexts.