Titlebook: Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach; Matthew Cotton Book 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Decision suppo

推崇

Conclusions,In this concluding chapter I aim to review the development of this ethical decision-support procedure termed . (REM) both in relation to the pragmatist conceptual framework that I outlined in chapter 3, and importantly, to the practice of participatory technology assessment (PTA).

confederacy

Barter

Ethics and Technology,ter broader acceptance of controversial technology proposals when they would have been otherwise objected to. At the very least, the processes and methods of PTA legitimise public objections, in the sense that they are transparent to decision-makers and based upon a process of justification through

AVOW

tic-douloureux

2192-6255 rical work in partnership with citizen-stakeholders, this book presents a model called “Reflective Ethical Mapping” - a new meta-ethical framework and toolbox of techniques to facilitate citizen engagement with978-3-662-52167-0978-3-642-45088-4Series ISSN 2192-6255 Series E-ISSN 2192-6263

debunk

Book 2014ts, legal or technical experts. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism and drawing upon empirical work in partnership with citizen-stakeholders, this book presents a model called “Reflective Ethical Mapping” - a new meta-ethical framework and toolbox of techniques to facilitate citizen engagement with

Malleable