找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Ethics after Anscombe; Post “Modern Moral P Duncan Richter Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 Ludwig Wittgenstein.eth

[复制链接]
查看: 45155|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 16:39:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Ethics after Anscombe
副标题Post “Modern Moral P
编辑Duncan Richter
视频video
丛书名称Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Ethics after Anscombe; Post “Modern Moral P Duncan Richter Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 Ludwig Wittgenstein.eth
描述How, if at all, can we do moral philosophy in the light of the radical critique made by Elizabeth Anscombe in "Modem Moral Philosophy"? Among the principal theses of this essay is that ethical thinking (that of philosophers and others) suffers from a widespread appeal to incoherent uses of terms such as ‘obligation,‘ ‘ought,‘ ‘right‘ and ‘wrong. ‘ In this book I first explain and evaluate her thesis and the argument for it, and I then confront the challenge it poses: what ways are there of doing moral philosophy that avoid the kind of incoherence to which she has drawn our attention? The best way to show how it is possible for us to think about ethics is to demonstrate how to do so, using actual cases. This book therefore combines the critical study of central theoretical issues about ethics, in the first half, with concrete examination of serious practical issues, in the second. Following Dostoyevsky‘s Ivan Karamazov, it is often said that if God does not exist then everything is permitted. This is not literally the case, since God cannot permit anything if He does not exist, and those of us who do exist do not permit everything, or at least our parents, employers, and governments
出版日期Book 2000
关键词Ludwig Wittgenstein; ethics; issue; moral philosophy; morality; philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1478-5
isbn_softcover978-90-481-5371-8
isbn_ebook978-94-017-1478-5Series ISSN 1387-6678 Series E-ISSN 2215-0323
issn_series 1387-6678
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Ethics after Anscombe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe网络公开度




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe被引频次




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe被引频次学科排名




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe年度引用




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe年度引用学科排名




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe读者反馈




书目名称Ethics after Anscombe读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:05:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:38:48 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26485-0It is time now to draw together my conclusions. I should say what I have tried to do, to what extent I think I have done it, and the implications that I take this work to have. This last point is one that I touched on at the end of chapter 6, and I would like to expand on what I said there. But first, what has been the point of this book?
发表于 2025-3-22 08:06:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:13:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:34:17 | 显示全部楼层
Mollusca. Amphineura und Scaphopodaribes the paper as “widely discussed and much admired”. and Peter Winch has called one of its three theses “enormously influential”. within moral philosophy. That such descriptions indicate failure rather than success, though, is evident from, among other things, the fact that in that paper Anscombe
发表于 2025-3-22 19:28:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:26:36 | 显示全部楼层
Das Reduktionsverfahren der Baustatiks. In this chapter I want to look at the views of two philosophers who believe that attention to the facts (or to the truth of a situation, if ‘facts’ smacks too much of scientific data) is of paramount importance. Part 1 will be an examination of Sabina Lovibond’s recommended approach to moral phil
发表于 2025-3-23 03:31:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:22:48 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-19666-2 We can see also just what it means in practice. I have suggested that there might be widespread incoherence in contemporary moral philosophy. In the next few chapters we will see a few examples of this. However, we should not expect ethics after Anscombe to be excessively different from ethics befo
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 11:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表