Titlebook: Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer; Mark Atten Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Edmu

pacific

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331274 the mathematical and philosophical background to Gödel’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for Gödel’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the

Melanocytes

Introduction and Research Focus,d but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for Gödel’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.

animated

含沙射影

Francesca Tesser,Charles R. Doering that Hintikka is wrong about what Gödel believed, and that, moreover, there exists a phenomenological unification of Gödel’s Platonism and possible worlds theory. This text was written for a special issue of . on the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann, which explains the two introductory paragraphs.

物种起源

江湖郎中

Collective Education in the Kibbutzs text was originally written in French and published in a special issue on logic of ., the French edition of .. This accounts for its introductory character and the absence of references and footnotes. The translation and slight revision are my own.

Resection

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8878-4n Gödel’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of Gödel to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that Gödel already thought of t

DEI

使入迷

978-3-319-37657-8Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

臆断