找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemology; Duncan Pritchard Book 2016Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 epistemology.knowledge.sceptic

[复制链接]
楼主: hypothyroidism
发表于 2025-3-27 00:28:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 04:17:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 08:04:44 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8829-6nowledge which is ‘Gettier-proof’. We noted that Gettier-style cases essentially trade on the anti-luck intuition that if one has knowledge then one has a true belief that could not have easily been wrong. In light of this fact, one natural thought to have is that rather than fixating on avoiding Ge
发表于 2025-3-27 13:02:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 16:21:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02019-3ge. The first — the . — was that knowledge is due to cognitive ability. The second — the . — was that knowledge excludes luck. When we first introduced these two intuitions about knowledge we also noted that one could regard them as closely related. What does it take to ensure that one’s true belief
发表于 2025-3-27 18:57:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 01:40:08 | 显示全部楼层
E. D. Ramsey,B. Minty,R. Babecki have historically been some people who have proposed such a position, its philosophical interest does not rest on whether there are any actual sceptics. The reason for this is that, properly expressed, radical scepticism is meant to be a ., in that it exposes a deep tension in our own epistemologic
发表于 2025-3-28 03:13:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:57:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 12:11:46 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 16:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表