找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities; Jeroen van Dongen,Herman Paul Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Ep

[复制链接]
楼主: hierarchy
发表于 2025-3-25 06:12:16 | 显示全部楼层
The Epistemic Virtues of the Virtuous Theorist: On Albert Einstein and His Autobiography,nts. This change accompanied his turn towards unified field theory and different presentations of himself, eventually leading to his highly programmatic . in 1949. Einstein enlisted his own history and professional stature to mold an ideal of a theoretical physicist who represented particular episte
发表于 2025-3-25 09:26:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:40:41 | 显示全部楼层
,Weber, Wöhler, and Waitz: Virtue Language in Late Nineteenth-Century Physics, Chemistry, and Historecial focus on obituaries written for the Göttingen professors Wilhelm Weber, Friedrich Wöhler, and Georg Waitz. Although virtue language was far more prevalent in Waitz’s necrologies than in those commemorating Wöhler and Weber, historians, chemists, and physicists resembled each other in that they
发表于 2025-3-25 17:49:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 21:27:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:32:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:53:45 | 显示全部楼层
,Johan Rudolph Thorbecke’s Revenge: Objectivity and the Rise of the Dutch Nation State,tical developments that took place in Dutch society in the nineteenth century. I argue that the emergence of objectivity was closely connected to the rise of a formally-ruled and integrated nation state. My analysis is based on a case study, which involves three historians: Philip Willem van Heusde,
发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 15:18:50 | 显示全部楼层
Scholarly Vices: Boundary Work in Nineteenth-Century Orientalism,d. Accordingly, criticism of Dozy and Ewald was part of a broader debate on the scholarly vocation and not seldom amounted to a form of “boundary work” between competing conceptions of Orientalist scholarship.
发表于 2025-3-26 20:48:26 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 06:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表