Titlebook: Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities; Jeroen van Dongen,Herman Paul Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Ep

hierarchy

书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities网络公开度




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities被引频次




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities年度引用




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities读者反馈




书目名称Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities读者反馈学科排名

Introduction

blackout

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48893-6Epistemic Virtues; Sciences and Humanities; Scholarly Personae; History of the Humanities; History of Sc

相容

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22167-6humanities.” Given that virtues like objectivity, honesty, and accuracy are not confined to specific disciplines, they allow for comparative historical research between scientific fields as well as for histories of transfer, borrowing, and adaptation between disciplines. Such research, however, requ

outset

Estimation of rate coefficients,proaches, valuable as they are, neglect the fact that certain changes also reflect changes in metaphysical sensibilities. Certain epistemic virtues and vices are defined relative to an estimate of our epistemic situation that is, in turn, defined by a broader vision or picture of the nature of reali

cloture

cloture

M. Braza,H. Ha Minh,J. B. Cazalbou needs to have some reassurance that further investigation will be fruitful despite setbacks, uncertainty, or confusing results. Two important physical scientists, James C. Maxwell and Arthur S. Eddington, drew on their religious beliefs and practices to help resolve this issue. They had very differ

CHOKE

Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documentsnts. This change accompanied his turn towards unified field theory and different presentations of himself, eventually leading to his highly programmatic . in 1949. Einstein enlisted his own history and professional stature to mold an ideal of a theoretical physicist who represented particular episte

纠缠,缠绕

Process Measurement and Redesign,gues that dispositions perceived as detrimental to scholarly work were often difficult to distinguish from social or religious vices. Indeed, when Heinrich Ewald (1803–1875) and Reinhart Dozy (1820–1883) were blamed for “dogmatism” and “rashness,” these were epistemic as much as social and religious

Malaise

Malathi Srinivasan,Ram Rajasekharanecial focus on obituaries written for the Göttingen professors Wilhelm Weber, Friedrich Wöhler, and Georg Waitz. Although virtue language was far more prevalent in Waitz’s necrologies than in those commemorating Wöhler and Weber, historians, chemists, and physicists resembled each other in that they