找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Pluralism; Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

[复制链接]
查看: 47891|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 19:41:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemic Pluralism
编辑Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen
视频video
概述Is the first edited collection solely focussed on epistemic pluralism.Investigates connections between epistemic pluralism and other epistemological paradigms.Shows how epistemic pluralism will serve
丛书名称Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemic Pluralism;  Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex
描述.This book examines epistemic pluralism, a brand new area of research in epistemology with dramatic implications for the discipline. Challenging traditional assumptions about the nature of justification, an expert team of contributors explores pluralism about justification, with compelling first-order results – including analysis of the various requisites one might want to impose on the notion of justification (and therefore of knowledge) and why. It is shown why a long-lasting dispute within epistemology about the nature of justification has reached a stalemate and how embracing a different overarching outlook might lead to progress and aid better appreciation of the relationship between the various epistemic projects scholars have been pursuing.. .With close connections to the idea of epistemic relativism, and with specific applications to various areas of contemporary epistemology (such as the debate over epistemic norms of action and assertion, epistemic peers‘ disagreement, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Epistemology; Pluralism; Justification; Knowledge; Relativism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88034-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
issn_series 2946-2851
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemic Pluralism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism网络公开度




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism被引频次




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism年度引用




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism读者反馈




书目名称Epistemic Pluralism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:15:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:27:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:53:56 | 显示全部楼层
How to Be a Pluralist About Self-Knowledgedorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:41:15 | 显示全部楼层
2946-2851 nt, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..978-3-319-88034-1978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
发表于 2025-3-22 18:54:22 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7936-9 do two things. First, I explain why the distinction between epistemic monism and epistemic pluralism is most interestingly drawn at the level of non-derivative epistemic goods. Second, I make the observation that, at a very fundamental level, the varieties of epistemic pluralism presented in Sect. 
发表于 2025-3-22 21:43:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:52:33 | 显示全部楼层
L. Szilágyi,S. M. Szilágyi,Z. Benyóhe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte
发表于 2025-3-23 09:04:35 | 显示全部楼层
Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Controldorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 13:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表