找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[复制链接]
楼主: Fixate
发表于 2025-3-23 12:36:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:21:43 | 显示全部楼层
2946-2738 theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy,
发表于 2025-3-23 19:16:58 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
发表于 2025-3-23 22:19:23 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2akers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality should go deeper than just the formal politics, rejecting Estlund’s view and claiming that the informal political sphere (e.g. contributions to political campaigns) should be more egalitarian as well.
发表于 2025-3-24 02:34:42 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo
发表于 2025-3-24 07:16:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 14:10:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:37:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 19:15:42 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1ld not give greater political authority to any specific group of citizens. This can be claimed only if one adopts a non-monistic account of political legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how
发表于 2025-3-25 02:03:00 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 03:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表